Peer Review Process
All papers, solicited and unsolicited, will be first assessed by the Managing Editor or one of the Editors. Papers found unsuitable in terms of the overall requirements of the journal will be returned. If suitable, the manuscripts will be sent to Reviewers for detailed review. We carry out single-blind peer review process. Authors of these papers will be notified of acceptance, need for revision or rejection of the paper. It may be noted that papers once rejected cannot be resubmitted. However, if the Editor or Reviewer recommends resubmission after detailed revision, the same will be communicated to the authors. 
Review details
The PBP peer reviews all the material it receives. We aim to reach a first decision on all manuscripts within two or three weeks of submission.
Structure and Preparation of Manuscripts
 Types of Articles
Manuscripts should be presented as one of the following formats.

5. Title page
5. Author(s)
5. Affiliation (s)
5. Abstract (Introduction, Objective, Materials and Methods, Results and Conclusion)
6. key words
5. Introduction
5. Objective
5. Materials and Methods
5. Results
5. Discussion
5. Acknowledgment
5. Conflicts of interest
5. Ethical considerations
5. Funding
5. References
5. Tables
5. Figures

General Considerations

5. Manuscript should be written in good English (American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture of these).
5. All manuscripts must be typed double spaced, single column, in size 12 font and adequate margins should be left.
5. No manuscripts submitted to the journal can exceed 6000 words.
5. Submitted manuscripts to the Plants Biotechnology Persa should not be under consideration for publication elsewhere.