Volume 5, Issue 2 (12-2023)
pbp 2023, 5(2): 22-32 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Yari H, Nazari H, Safari-Faramani R. Comparison of the effectiveness of ketorolac injection into the masseter and medial pterygoid muscles in preventing the post-operative complications after mandibular third molar surgery. pbp 2023; 5 (2) :22-32
URL: http://pbp.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-168-en.html
URL: http://pbp.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-168-en.html
1- School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran , h.yari7493@gmail.com
2- School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
3- Department of Epidemiology, School of Health Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center Research Institute for Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
2- School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
3- Department of Epidemiology, School of Health Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center Research Institute for Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract: (1388 Views)
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative ketorolac injection on reducing or eliminating postoperative complications in order to find the best site for injection. Thus, the amount of annoyance and dissatisfaction of the patient is reduced so that the patient can move toward surgery with facing less problems and complications after treatment.
Material and Methods: In this study, patients were divided into 2 groups of 42 individuals. After the injection of IANB anesthesia, 30 mgs of ketorolac was injected into the master muscle for the first group and 30 mg of ketorolac was injected into the medial pterygoid muscle for the second group. Pain, edema, trismus, mouth opening rate and patients ‘general satisfaction were assessed on the second and seventh days after surgery. Data were analyzed by Stata v 14.2 software and statistical tests.
Results: In the present study, although in the group receiving ketorolac in medial pterygoid muscle the outcomes of pain on both the second and seventh days and swelling on the second day, less and maximum mouth opening and general satisfaction of the patient on the second day, were higher, but these differences were not statistically significant and the only significant difference was in the satisfaction parameter of patients after surgery on the seventh day, so that the patients receiving the ketorolac in the medial pterygoid muscle reported higher satisfaction (p=0.021).
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that there was no significant difference in the outcomes of pain, swelling, trismus and maximum mouth opening between the two groups of injection of ketorolac into the master muscle and medial pterygoid muscle, and only a significant difference was in the general satisfaction parameter of patients after surgery on the seventh day, so that patients receiving the ketorolac into the medial pterygoid muscle reported more satisfaction than the master muscle.
Material and Methods: In this study, patients were divided into 2 groups of 42 individuals. After the injection of IANB anesthesia, 30 mgs of ketorolac was injected into the master muscle for the first group and 30 mg of ketorolac was injected into the medial pterygoid muscle for the second group. Pain, edema, trismus, mouth opening rate and patients ‘general satisfaction were assessed on the second and seventh days after surgery. Data were analyzed by Stata v 14.2 software and statistical tests.
Results: In the present study, although in the group receiving ketorolac in medial pterygoid muscle the outcomes of pain on both the second and seventh days and swelling on the second day, less and maximum mouth opening and general satisfaction of the patient on the second day, were higher, but these differences were not statistically significant and the only significant difference was in the satisfaction parameter of patients after surgery on the seventh day, so that the patients receiving the ketorolac in the medial pterygoid muscle reported higher satisfaction (p=0.021).
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that there was no significant difference in the outcomes of pain, swelling, trismus and maximum mouth opening between the two groups of injection of ketorolac into the master muscle and medial pterygoid muscle, and only a significant difference was in the general satisfaction parameter of patients after surgery on the seventh day, so that patients receiving the ketorolac into the medial pterygoid muscle reported more satisfaction than the master muscle.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Clinical
Received: 2022/11/24 | Accepted: 2022/11/26 | Published: 2022/11/26
Received: 2022/11/24 | Accepted: 2022/11/26 | Published: 2022/11/26
References
1. Bouloux GF, Steed MB, Perciaccante VJ. Complications of third molar surgery. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics. 2007;19(1):117-28.
2. Janakiraman EN, Alexander M, Sanjay P. Prospective analysis of frequency and contributing factors of nerve injuries following third-molar surgery. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2010;21(3):784-6.
3. Mangalgi A, Shah K, Sajjanshetty S, Patil S, Halkai S. INTRAMUSCULAR ADMINISTRATION OF KETOROLAC VERSUS TRAMADOL POST OPERATIVELY IN MINOR ORAL SURGERY. International Journal of Scientific Research. 2019;7(12).
4. Shepherd JP, Brickley M. Surgical removal of third molars. British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 1994.
5. Rao TD, Kumar M. Analgesic Efficacy of Paracetamol Vs Ketorolac after Dental Extractions. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018;11(8):3375-9.
6. Khiavi RK, Pourallahverdi M, Pourallahverdi A, Khiavi SG, Oskouei SG, Mokhtari H. Pain control following impacted third molar surgery with bupivacaine irrigation of tooth socket: a prospective study. Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects. 2010;4(4):105.
7. Ong CK, Seymour R. Pathogenesis of postoperative oral surgical pain. Anesthesia progress. 2003;50(1):5.
8. Abbas S, Kamal R, Afshan G. Effect of ketorolac on postoperative pain relief in dental extraction cases--a comparative study with pethidine. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 2004;54(6):319.
9. Laureano Filho JR, Maurette PE, Allais M, Cotinho M, Fernandes C. Clinical comparative study of the effectiveness of two dosages of dexamethasone to control postoperative swelling, trismus and pain after the surgical extraction of mandibular impacted third molars. CEP. 2008;54753:220.
10. Aliabadie E, Khaghani MS, Izadi A, Hasani M. Comparison of the Efficacy of Prednisolone and Dexamethasone on Reduction of Pain and Swelling after Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth Surgery. World Family Medicine Journal: Incorporating the Middle East Journal of Family Medicine. 2018;99(5832):1-6.
11. Osunde O, Adebola R, Omeje U. Management of inflammatory complications in third molar surgery: a review of the literature. African health sciences. 2011;11(3).
12. Shirani M, Hasanzade M, Moadabi A, Attar BM. Comparison of the effectiveness of dexamethasone injection into two different sites in preventing the postoperative complications after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research. 2016:1-11.
13. Seymour R, Meechan J, Blair G. An investigation into post-operative pain after third molar surgery under local analgesia. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1985;23(6):410-8.
14. Lee J, Do H, Lim J, Jang HS, Rim J, Kwon J, et al. Correlation of antibiotic prophylaxis and difficulty of extraction with postoperative inflammatory complications in the lower third molar surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;52(1):54-7.
15. Graziani F, D’aiuto F, Arduino PG, Tonelli M, Gabriele M. Perioperative dexamethasone reduces post-surgical sequelae of wisdom tooth removal. A split-mouth randomized double-masked clinical trial. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2006;35(3):241-6.
16. Bailey B, Zaki G, Rotman H, Woodwards R. A double-blind comparative study of soluble aspirin and diclofenac dispersible in the control of postextraction pain after removal of impacted third molars. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1993;22(4):238-41.
17. Selvaraj L, Rao SH, Lankupalli AS. Comparison of efficacy of methylprednisolone injection into masseter muscle versus gluteal muscle for surgical removal of impacted lower third molar. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery. 2014;13(4):495-8.
18. Mony D, Kulkarni D, Shetty L. Comparative evaluation of preemptive analgesic effect of injected intramuscular diclofenac and ketorolac after third molar surgery-a randomized controlled trial. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2016;10(6):ZC102.
19. Peterson L, Ellis E, Hupp J, Tucker M. Principles of exodontia. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 4th ed Elsevier. 2003:184-220.
20. Hupp J. Wound repair In: Peterson LJ, Ellise E, Hupp JR, Tucker MR. Contemporary Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 4th ed, St Louis: The CV Mosby Co. 2003:54.
21. Laskin DM. Oral and maxillofacial surgery: Mosby; 1980.
22. Peterson L. Postoperative patient management. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1998;3:251.
23. Garcia AG, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Torreira MG. Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower third molars. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1997;55(11):1223-6.
24. Clauser B, Barone R, Briccoli L, Baleani A. Complications in surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Minerva Stomatologica. 2009;58(7/8):359-66.
25. Tabiat-Pour S, Morris J. NICE guidelines and their relevance to the dental team. Dental update. 2008;35(2):122-33.
26. Christiaens I, Reychler H. Complications after third molar extractions: retrospective analysis of 1,213 teeth. Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale. 2002;103(5):269-74.
27. Nørholt SE, Aagaard E, Svensson P, Sindet-Pedersen S. Evaluation of trismus, bite force, and pressure algometry after third molar surgery: a placebo-controlled study of ibuprofen. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1998;56(4):420-7.
28. Maurette PE, de Maurette MA, Cotinho M, Fernandes C. Clinical comparative study of the effectiveness of two dosages of dexamethasone to control postoperative swelling, trismus and pain after the surgical extraction of mandibular impacted third molars. 2008.
29. Yuasa H, Sugiura M. Clinical postoperative findings after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: prediction of postoperative facial swelling and pain based on preoperative variables. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2004;42(3):209-14.
30. McAleer SD, Majid O, Venables E, Polack T, Sheikh MS. Pharmacokinetics and safety of ketorolac following single intranasal and intramuscular administration in healthy volunteers. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2007;47(1):13-8.
31. Lee SY, Lee WH, Lee EH, Han KC, Ko YK. The effects of paracetamol, ketorolac, and paracetamol plus morphine on pain control after thyroidectomy. The Korean journal of pain. 2010;23(2):124.
32. Alexander RE, Throndson RR. A review of perioperative corticosteroid use in dentoalveolar surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2000;90(4):406-15.
33. Kim K, Brar P, Jakubowski J, Kaltman S, Lopez E. The use of corticosteroids and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication for the management of pain and inflammation after third molar surgery: a review of the literature. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2009;107(5):630-40.
34. Carriches CL, González JMM, Rodríguez MD. The use of methylprednisolone versus diclofenac in the treatment of inflammation and trismus after surgical removal of lower third molars. Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal Ed inglesa. 2006;11(5):12.
35. Beeman CS. Third molar management: a case for routine removal in adolescent and young adult orthodontic patients. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 1999;57(7):824.
36. Berge TI, Bøe OE. Predictor evaluation of postoperative morbidity after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1994;52(3):162-9.
37. Conrad SM, Blakey GH, Shugars DA, Marciani RD, Phillips C, White Jr RP. Patients' perception of recovery after third molar surgery. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1999;57(11):1288-94.
38. Dereci O, Tuzuner-Oncul AM, Kocer G, Yuce E, Askar M, Ozturk A. Efficacy of immediate postoperative intramasseteric dexamethasone injection on postoperative swelling after mandibular impacted third molar surgery: A preliminary split-mouth study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(3):320-3.
39. Sabhlok S, Kenjale P, Mony D, Khatri I, Kumar P. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of oral dexamethasone and intramuscular dexamethasone in mandibular third molar surgeries. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015;9(11):ZC48.
40. Nandini G. Eventuality of dexamethasone injected intra-massetrically on post operative sequel following the surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a prospective study. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery. 2016;15(4):456-60.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |